VolModel
Create free accountUpgrade
Account

CompaniesLINCLincoln Educational ServicesWatch

LINC earnings: an expected move of 9.4%, an actual move of 11.0%.Averages over nine of its last twelve reports. Here are all 15 reports.

Every Lincoln Educational Services earnings report since May 2023: the expected move the options priced the day before, how far the stock moved by the close and by 10:00 the next morning, and the IV crush afterwards, how far implied volatility fell. We read option prices from real quotes at 15:46 ET. Definitions on the methodology page.

Next reportMon 9Nov · BMO1 days out
Expected move9.4%the day before, over nine of the last twelve reports
Actual move11.0%to the next close over nine of the last twelve · 6.9% by 10:00
Past the price6of 9closes further than the options priced
On record15reportsevery report since May 2023
Median IV crush−25%over the last twelve reports · 15:46 ET

Next report · before the open · 1 day out

LINC’s expected move for Mon 9 Nov

Priced now%

The options already price it. The number, and how rich it is against LINC’s own history, opens free on report day, Mon 9 Nov, with an account. Subscribers read it now.

LINC · the Aug 10 ’26 report, split and ranked

The options price an earnings move as one number. We take out the drift the stock would have had anyway, then rank what is left, the report’s own part, against LINC’s earlier reports. Both were fixed at 15:46 ET the day before, and the history below does the same for every report.

1 · Split

14.1% quoted, 10.7% of it the report

quoted14.1%the report10.7%ordinary9.2%0%5%10%15%

The options ran ten trading sessions, so the quote also carries ten days of the drift LINC has anyway: 9.2%. The two combine as squares, not sums, so 10.7 and 9.2 give 14.1. The report is 58% of that expiry’s risk.

§3 Splitting the move

2 · Rank

Higher than seven of its last eight

cheaprichAug 10 ’26 · 10.7%lowest of the ninehighest

We rank only the report’s part, and only against LINC’s own earlier reports, so a jumpy stock does not read rich for being jumpy. 10.7% is the 88th percentile: rich for LINC.

§5 Richness

3 · What happened

Moved 24.9%, past the 10.7%

priced ±10.7%close −24.9% · 10:00 −19.1%−35%0+35%

−24.9% by the next close, −19.1% by 10:00 the next morning. The rank compares the price with LINC’s past and does not forecast the move.

§1 Timing and samples

ReportAug 10 ’26Compared witheight earlier reportsRank88th percentile · richHow the rank works 

LINC · what nine of the last twelve reports show

The charts read oldest to newest, left to right.priced moveclosed inside itclosed past itfall in implied volatility
Inside or past

Inside its priced move after three of nine

Aug ’24: priced 6.5%, moved +4.5%Nov ’24: priced 10.5%, moved +3.6%Feb ’25: priced 8.9%, moved +15.3%May ’25: priced 8.9%, moved +1.9%Aug ’25: priced 9.1%, moved −15.1%Nov ’25: priced 12.4%, moved +12.8%Feb ’26: priced 9.7%, moved +10.2%May ’26: priced 8.2%, moved +10.6%Aug ’26: priced 10.7%, moved −24.9%Aug ’24Aug ’26

Past it: Feb 2025 +15.3%, Aug 2025 −15.1%, Nov 2025 +12.8%, Feb 2026 +10.2%, May 2026 +10.6% and Aug 2026 −24.9%.

Columns C2C, Priced in the table below

The biggest

−24.9% after the Aug 2026 report

priced10.7%moved, to the next close24.9%Aug ’26

The options had priced 10.7%.

Columns C2C, Priced in the table below

Implied volatility

Fell after eight of the nine, by 6% to 42%

Aug ’24: −6%Nov ’24: −26%Feb ’25: −25%May ’25: −36%Aug ’25: −12%Nov ’25: −42%May ’26: −9%Aug ’26: −30%median −25%Aug ’24Aug ’26

Median fall 25%, at the strike nearest the price, day before to day after. It rose after one.

Columns Crush · ATM in the table below

The priced move

Grown: 10.3% over the last four

Aug ’24: priced 6.5%Nov ’24: priced 10.5%Feb ’25: priced 8.9%May ’25: priced 8.9%Aug ’25: priced 9.1%Nov ’25: priced 12.4%Feb ’26: priced 9.7%May ’26: priced 8.2%Aug ’26: priced 10.7%8.8%10.3%five beforelast four

From 8.8% over the five before. The report’s own part of the move, with the ordinary drift taken out.

Columns Priced in the table below

Reportsnine of the last twelve, settledWrittenfrom the numbers on this pageHow each one is measured 

LINC · earnings history: expected move vs actual move, all 15

CSV ↓
Columns shown on a phone
Every LINC earnings report: expected move, actual move and IV crush
Report Report’s partPricedRank RealizedC2C By 10:00 Priced · realized · ±25% CrushATM As-sold Open ForecastPred. Error
Nov 9 ’26BMOpending ±13.6% — — — — — — — —
Aug 10 ’26BMO ±10.7% rich88 −24.9% −19.1% −30% — −22% −28% −2pt
May 11 ’26BMO ±8.2% — +10.6% +10.3% −9% −3% −13% −14% +4pt
Feb 23 ’26BMO ±9.7% — +10.2% +2.0% 13% −11% −7% — —
Nov 10 ’25BMO ±12.4% — +12.8% +7.8% −42% −24% −27% −41% −2pt
Aug 11 ’25BMO ±9.1% — −15.1% −6.7% −12% −18% −15% −17% +5pt
May 12 ’25BMO ±8.9% — +1.9% +0.7% −36% −27% −14% −18% −18pt
Feb 24 ’25BMO ±8.9% — +15.3% +10.5% −25% — — — —
Nov 11 ’24BMO ±10.5% — +3.6% +1.5% −26% −16% — — —
Aug 8 ’24BMO ±6.5% — +4.5% −3.3% −6% — — — —
May 6 ’24BMO — — +10.3% +2.2% −25% 3% — — —
Feb 26 ’24BMO — — +5.3% +7.5% −7% −7% 1% — —
Nov 6 ’23BMO — — +8.8% +8.0% −30% — — — —
Aug 7 ’23BMO — — +19.6% +16.6% — — — — —
May 8 ’23BMO — — +7.5% — — — — — —
All · 15 ±9.4% avg 1 ranked 11.0% avg abs 6.9% avg abs −25% median −14% median −14% median −18% median 6.2pt avg abs
What the columns mean6 groups · 10 columns
Report’s part
The report’s share of what options priced at 15:46 ET the day before, taken from two or more expiries.
ColumnsPriced
Rank
Where the report’s part sits among LINC’s own earlier reports, up to twelve, from 0 to 100: 88 on Aug 10 ’26 means it was priced higher than 7 of the 8 before it. Rich and cheap mark the top and bottom of that range. It needs eight earlier reports with a 10:00 move, so the oldest rows have none.
ColumnsRank
Realized
C2C is the move to the next close; By 10:00, the move to 10:00 the next morning.
ColumnsC2CBy 10:00
Chart
The grey band is what the options priced, the dark mark where the stock closed, the bar where it stood at 10:00, on a ±25% scale.
ColumnsPriced · realized · ±25%
Crush
How far implied volatility fell in the report’s expiry, from 15:46 ET the day before to the day after: at the new strike ATM and at the old one As-sold. Open reads it from the option’s 10:00 quotes the next morning, and is blank where there was none.
ColumnsATMAs-soldOpen
Forecast
Pred. is the crush we published the day before. LINC is not in the public record, which covers only companies liquid enough for the split to be trusted. Error is what happened minus the forecast, in points of the crush.
ColumnsPred.Error
15 reports on record, 14 measured. The stock closed past the priced move on 6 of 9 and was past it at 10:00 the next morning on 3 of 9. All 5 forecasts were rebuilt from history rather than published the day before, and all are graded here. LINC is not in the public record, which covers only companies liquid enough for the split to be trusted. A dash is a number we do not have, not a zero; on a pending row it has not settled yet.
Reports15Open crush7 of 15Measured15:46 ET · day before → day afterEvery company’s full history is public 

how these numbers are measured

A day's price path that ends near where it started: a short graphite bracket for the move from close to close, beside a much taller oxblood one for how far it swung in betweento the closein between
Two ways to measure the move

Closing prices miss the open

If you hold through the report you meet the open, not the close. We publish both: the move from one close to the next, and where the stock stood at 10:00 the next morning.

LINC Aug 2025: −15.1% by the close, −6.7% at 10:00.

§1 Timing and samples

One beam enters a prism and two leave, one oxblood and one slatethe reportordinary
The report’s own share of it

Option prices cover more than the report

An expiry a week out also carries a week of ordinary movement. Comparing two expiries that both contain the report separates the two, and the report's share is the priced move.

LINC Aug 2026: 14.1% from the options → 10.7% for the report, 58% of that expiry's risk.

§3 Splitting the move

Five expiries on a line; an oxblood beam strikes only the first, while a faint bracket spans all fivethe one that movedwhat 30 days average
The collapse in volatility

We measure the expiry that moved

A 30-day average mixes the expiry holding the report with expiries it never reaches, so it reads shallower than what you held. We read the expiry that holds the report, the day before and the day after, at both strikes.

LINC Aug 2026: −30% new strike, −22% at 10:00 the next morning.

§4 The collapse, three ways

LINC · IV crush at the report’s expiry vs the 30-day average

One expiry contains the report. The 30-day figure is an average that also covers expiries the report never reaches. Every column below leans the same way, so the gap shows on each report, not only in the median.

Collapse at the report’s expiry−18%median, whole column
Seen by the 30-day number−18%median, the part it sees
Missed by the 30-day number0pton 4 of 10 reports
Aug 10 ’26May 11 ’26Feb 23 ’26Nov 10 ’25Aug 11 ’25May 12 ’25Feb 24 ’25Nov 11 ’24Aug 8 ’24Feb 26 ’24

LINC · the expected move, where it closed, where it stood at 10:00

Each row is one report: the band is what the options priced, the mark is where the stock closed, and the bar runs to where it stood at 10:00 the next morning. On 1 of 9 reports with both, the close and 10:00 pointed opposite ways.

Where the 10:00 number is missing, the cell stays blank instead of borrowing the close, and the data-quality grid below says why. How far apart the two run differs from company to company; this window measures it for LINC.

Median move to the next close10.6%past the price on 6 of 9
Median move by 10:00 the next morning6.7%past the price on 3 of 9
Aug 10 ’26−24.9−19.1
May 11 ’26+10.6+10.3
Feb 23 ’26+10.2+2.0
Nov 10 ’25+12.8+7.8
Aug 11 ’25−15.1−6.7
May 12 ’25+1.9+0.7
Feb 24 ’25+15.3+10.5
Nov 11 ’24+3.6+1.5
Aug 8 ’24+4.5−3.3
−25−12.50+12.5+25

LINC · the term structure the day before each report

The split reads the report out of the gap between the two lines. The small figure under each date is how many trading sessions the expiry holding the report had left. A shorter one carries the same report over fewer days, so it reads higher without the report being priced any bigger.

Drawn for the last twelve reports, like the other figures on this page. It is history; the current curve is on the board.

the expiry holding the reportthe next expirythe gap the split readsimplied vol, %

LINC · data quality, report by report

Counted over the 15 reports shown. A marker on one quarter says little about the company, and one on most of them says a lot, so the count is what tells them apart. One of the 15 has not settled. It already carries the markers set the day before; a marker that depends on what happened after the report is counted over the 14 that have, and shows as an outline on the one that has not.

Every marker on the reports above is counted here, one cell per report, newest first as in the history table.

Nov 9
’26
Aug 10
’26
May 11
’26
Feb 23
’26
Nov 10
’25
Aug 11
’25
May 12
’25
Feb 24
’25
Nov 11
’24
Aug 8
’24
May 6
’24
Feb 26
’24
Nov 6
’23
Aug 7
’23
May 8
’23
reports
WithheldThe cell is blank on the marked reports.
no prediction10 of 15
no trade at the cover6 of 14
no decomposition3 of 15
decomposition failed2 of 15
no T+1 ATM quote1 of 14
no T+1 chain1 of 14
no 10:00 tape1 of 14
Shown, kept off the board’s sortPublished, but it does not rank this name on the board.
wide decomposition band6 of 15
derived numbers unreliable5 of 15
wide straddle quote3 of 15
Shown as measuredNotes on how a number was measured. Each says what it touches.
macro event in the window12 of 15
next-morning price from quotes7 of 14
skew contamination6 of 14
no re-struck cover IV6 of 14
crush expiry substituted4 of 15
What each marker means15 markers · 7 withhold a number

Withheld

no prediction10 of 15crush_pred_unavailable
No predicted crush could be frozen for this print, so it has no entry in the scored accuracy record. Never filled in afterwards — a prediction written after the outcome is not one.
Lands inPred.Error
no trade at the cover6 of 14open_crush_no_trade
The option legs did not trade at the 10:00 cover anchor, so the crush there could not be measured. It comes from the tape, not an outage, so it is permanent and counts in the published coverage ratio.
Lands inOpen
no decomposition3 of 15decomp_unavailable
There were not enough usable expiries, or not enough distinct ones, to separate the report's move from ordinary volatility, so its split is blank.
Lands inPriced move
decomposition failed2 of 15decomp_failed
The maths that splits implied volatility into the report's own part and the ordinary part had no valid answer for this name, so its split is not published.
Lands inPriced move
no T+1 ATM quote1 of 14post_atm_unavailable
The option chain after the print was read, but the contract the crush is measured on had no two-sided quote near the money. No crush exists to measure. A property of the data, not an outage.
Lands inEvery crush column
no T+1 chain1 of 14post_unavailable
The option chain on the session after the print has no contracts near the money within 75 days, on a date long since published. No crush exists to measure. A property of the data, not an outage.
Lands inEvery crush column
no 10:00 tape1 of 14rm_intra_unavailable
The equity minute bars behind the 10:00 anchor do not exist for this session, so the anchor is blank and stays blank. It is never substituted from the opening price: a history with two different anchors mixed together is worse than a shorter one.
Lands inBy 10:00Open

Shown, kept off the board’s sort

wide decomposition band6 of 15decomp_low_confidence
The decomposed implied move has a wide confidence band on this row. The number is published and kept off the board’s sort, because a sort cannot express an error bar; where its rank is shown, it is marked ≈.
Lands inPriced move
derived numbers unreliable5 of 15derived_unreliable
Quotes on this name were too wide — or a 25Δ wing was missing — for the derived numbers on this row to be trusted: implied move, decomposition, crush and skew. Shown, kept off the board’s sort, and marked ≈ where its rank is shown.
Lands inThe derived columns
wide straddle quote3 of 15wide_quote
The T−1 straddle’s bid-ask spread was wide relative to its own price, so every number read off that quote inherits the width. Published on purpose — the friction is real — but kept off the board’s sort, and marked ≈ where its rank is shown.
Lands inImplied (naive)Short-straddle P&Lon the ticker page, not this one

Shown as measured

macro event in the window12 of 15decomp_macro_window
A scheduled macro event (a CPI print, an FOMC day) falls inside the decomposition window, so a little of the volatility attributed to the event belongs to the calendar instead.
Lands inPriced move
next-morning price from quotes7 of 14open_crush_restruck_quoted
The option at the 10:00 strike did not trade on both sides between 09:55 and 10:05, so the next-morning volatility was read from the midpoint of its quoted bid and ask over the same ten minutes. Used only when both sides were quoted and the quote was less than 50% wide.
Lands inOpen
skew contamination6 of 14crush_skew_contaminated
The gap between the strike sold and where the stock ended up is large enough that the as-sold crush cannot stand in for the comparable one, so this print carries no scored open crush.
Lands inAccuracy recordon the public record, which does not include this company
no re-struck cover IV6 of 14open_crush_restruck_unavailable
The comparable at-the-money volatility could not be read at the 10:00 anchor, so only the as-sold contract is available there.
Lands inOpen
crush expiry substituted4 of 15crush_expiry_substituted
The expiry that would have been measured was not available on both sides of the print, so a neighbouring one stood in. The crush is real; it is measured on a slightly different contract than the label implies.
Lands inATM

LINC · companies whose reports traded alike

Each company’s last twelve reports.average priced movemoved less than pricedmoved moremedian fall in implied volatilityLINC’s values

Six companies whose reports traded like LINC’s

The closest on all three numbers at the top of each company page. It compares how the reports traded, not the businesses.

8%8%10%10%12%12%AEOAKAMAMKRARMATIAVAVBBBBWIBOOTBURLCALYCARCARGCAVACCCHTRCHWYCIENCIFRCLSCLSKCNXCCOHRCOINCRCLCRLCROXCWHCXMDDOGDECKDGDLTRDOCUDVADXCMELEPAMERICETSYEXPEFFIVFLRFOURFRPTFTAIFTNTFVRRGEOGHGIIIGLOBGLXYGOOSGTGWREHOODHUBSHUTILMNINTCIONQITLEULITELNTHLSCCLULULWLZBMEDMLKNMRVLMUNBISNCLHNETNICENKENOWNTAPNTNXNTRANXTOKLOONONORCLOSCRPAYCPDDPENPLNTPODDPRGSPVHRDWRIVNRKLBRMBSRNGROKURPDRUMRVLVSESFMSHAKSHOPSIGSMRSNDKSOFISPOTSTNESTRATALTDOCTEVATGTTHCTITNTMETOSTTPRTSEMULTAURBNUSARUTIVFCVGVKTXVRTWCCWHRWINGWIXWULFWWWXYZYOUZZBRAZGZSZUMZJBLUCLFLINCAPPNTERUAACEaverage priced move →average move made →all 728
Where they sit. A close-up of LINC’s part of the field; the small map in its corner shows where that sits among all 728 companies with a page and all three numbers. Grey dots are other companies here. Below the dashed line, a stock moved less than its options priced.
Figureseach company’s last twelve reportsCompared onpriced, moved, crush

the board · the last fortnight, then the next 14 days

PricedRichness · own historyRatioOutcome
  1. Reported · the fortnight to 5 Nov · settled, free
  2. 1COPConocoPhillipsNov 5BMO3.4%1001.79inside
  3. 2EOGEOG ResourcesNov 5AMC4.2%1001.58inside
  4. 3GEOGeo GroupNov 5BMO9.8%1001.31inside
  5. 4GHGuardant HealthNov 5AMC19.1%1002.10inside
  6. 5KTOSKratos Defense & Security SolutionsNov 5AMC11.9%1001.59inside
  7. Next 14 days · 523 names · symbol and date free
  8. ·AAONMon 9AMC—
  9. ·ABCLMon 9AMC—
  10. ·ACHRMon 9AMC—
  11. ·AIOTMon 9BMO—
  12. 11 of 523 shown · the next 14 days

    The ranked columns are the board

    Symbol and date are free for all 523 names. A subscription fills in the three columns held back on every locked row: the priced move, its richness against that name's own last twelve reports, and the ratio between them.

    $29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year
    $29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year

    A free account adds today’s board rows and the full 14-day calendar, without these three columns.

    Today's board rows and the full forward calendar are on your board.

  13. ·ALTGMon 9AMC—
  14. ·AMCXMon 9AMC—
  15. ·AMGMon 9BMO—
  16. ·AMPYMon 9AMC—
  17. ·AMRCMon 9AMC—
  18. ·ANNXMon 9BMO—
  19. ·APEIMon 9AMC—
The board: the last fortnight’s settled reports, then the next 14 days
#NameReportPriced moveRichness · own historyRatioOutcome
Reported · the fortnight to 5 Nov · settled, free
1COPConocoPhillipsNov 5BMO3.4%1001.79inside
2EOGEOG ResourcesNov 5AMC4.2%1001.58inside
3GEOGeo GroupNov 5BMO9.8%1001.31inside
4GHGuardant HealthNov 5AMC19.1%1002.10inside
5KTOSKratos Defense & Security SolutionsNov 5AMC11.9%1001.59inside
Next 14 days · 523 names · symbol and date free
·AAONMon 9AMC—
·ABCLMon 9AMC—
·ACHRMon 9AMC—
·AIOTMon 9BMO—
12 of 523 shown · the next 14 days

The ranked columns are the board

Symbol and date are free for all 523 names. A subscription fills in the three columns held back on every locked row: the priced move, its richness against that name's own last twelve reports, and the ratio between them.

$29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year
$29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year

A free account adds today’s board rows and the full 14-day calendar, without these three columns.

Today's board rows and the full forward calendar are on your board.

·ALTGMon 9AMC—
·AMCXMon 9AMC—
·AMGMon 9BMO—
·AMPYMon 9AMC—
·AMRCMon 9AMC—
·ANNXMon 9BMO—
·APEIMon 9AMC—
·APPSMon 9AMC—
on the board — not known yet Ranked by richness against each name's own last twelve reports. Ratio is the priced move over that name’s typical actual move; inside: the stock stayed within the priced move.

How to read this page

History table
Its columns are explained right under it: What the columns mean ↑
Coverage
LINC’s 15 reports. The board rows are the fortnight’s five richest settled reports, then the first of the next 523 names.
Ratio
The priced move over the name’s typical actual move.
Markers
Notes on a report’s data, counted in the data-quality grid with what each one touches.

A number looks wrong? Tell us what you expected and we’ll check it.Report a data issue

History is a record, not a forecast. Derived values only; no option prices are shown. Nothing here is investment advice.