VolModel
Create free accountUpgrade
Account

CompaniesPOSTPost HoldingsWatch

POST earnings: an expected move of 4.2%, an actual move of 4.8%.Averages over its last twelve reports. Here are all 14 reports.

Every Post Holdings earnings report since May 2023: the expected move the options priced the day before, how far the stock moved by the close and by 10:00 the next morning, and the IV crush afterwards, how far implied volatility fell. We read option prices from real quotes at 15:46 ET. Definitions on the methodology page.

Next reportThu 19Nov · AMC11 days out
Expected move4.2%the day before each of the last twelve reports
Actual move4.8%to the next close over the last twelve · 4.1% by 10:00
Past the price6of 12closes further than the options priced
On record14reportsevery report since May 2023
Median IV crush−34%over the last twelve reports · 15:46 ET

Next report · after the close · 11 days out

POST’s expected move for Thu 19 Nov

Priced now%

The options already price it. The number, and how rich it is against POST’s own history, opens free on report day, Thu 19 Nov, with an account. Subscribers read it now.

POST · the Aug 6 ’26 report, split and ranked

The options price an earnings move as one number. We take out the drift the stock would have had anyway, then rank what is left, the report’s own part, against POST’s earlier reports. Both were fixed at 15:46 ET the day before, and the history below does the same for every report.

1 · Split

7.7% quoted, 5.4% of it the report

quoted7.7%the report5.4%ordinary5.5%0%2%4%6%8%10%12%

The options ran eleven trading sessions, so the quote also carries eleven days of the drift POST has anyway: 5.5%. The two combine as squares, not sums, so 5.4 and 5.5 give 7.7. The report is 49% of that expiry’s risk.

§3 Splitting the move

2 · Rank

Higher than all of its last twelve

cheaprichAug 6 ’26 · 5.4%error bar 0.0–12.8% ↑lowest of the thirteenhighest

We rank only the report’s part, and only against POST’s own earlier reports, so a jumpy stock does not read rich for being jumpy. 5.4% is the 100th percentile: rich for POST. Read it as roughly there: its part has a wide error bar, 0.0% to 12.8%, which takes in every one of the twelve, so the board does not sort on it.

§5 Richness

3 · What happened

Moved 12.8%, past the 5.4%

priced ±5.4%close −12.8% · 10:00 −9.7%−20%0+20%

−12.8% by the next close, −9.7% by 10:00 the next morning. The rank compares the price with POST’s past and does not forecast the move.

§1 Timing and samples

ReportAug 6 ’26Compared withtwelve earlier reportsRank100th percentile · rich≈How the rank works 

POST · what the last twelve reports show

The charts read oldest to newest, left to right.priced moveclosed inside itclosed past itfall in implied volatility
Inside or past

Inside its priced move after six of twelve

Nov ’23: priced 3.8%, moved −1.4%Feb ’24: priced 3.6%, moved +7.7%May ’24: priced 3.4%, moved −2.1%Aug ’24: priced 4.7%, moved +3.0%Nov ’24: priced 4.5%, moved −1.5%Feb ’25: priced 4.1%, moved +6.3%May ’25: priced 3.9%, moved −0.1%Aug ’25: priced 4.0%, moved +4.9%Nov ’25: priced 4.0%, moved −7.2%Feb ’26: priced 4.3%, moved +9.8%May ’26: priced 4.2%, moved −0.9%Aug ’26: priced 5.4%, moved −12.8%Nov ’23Aug ’26

Past it: Feb 2024 +7.7%, Feb 2025 +6.3%, Aug 2025 +4.9%, Nov 2025 −7.2%, Feb 2026 +9.8% and Aug 2026 −12.8%.

Columns C2C, Priced in the table below

The biggest

−12.8% after the Aug 2026 report

priced5.4%moved, to the next close12.8%Aug ’26

The options had priced 5.4%.

Columns C2C, Priced in the table below

Implied volatility

Fell after every one, by 10% to 47%

Nov ’23: −27%Feb ’24: −33%May ’24: −42%Aug ’24: −36%Nov ’24: −17%Feb ’25: −32%May ’25: −42%Aug ’25: −37%Nov ’25: −10%Feb ’26: −33%May ’26: −39%Aug ’26: −47%median −34%Nov ’23Aug ’26

Median fall 34%, at the strike nearest the price, day before to day after.

Columns Crush · ATM in the table below

The priced move

Held steady: 4.5% over the last four

Nov ’23: priced 3.8%Feb ’24: priced 3.6%May ’24: priced 3.4%Aug ’24: priced 4.7%Nov ’24: priced 4.5%Feb ’25: priced 4.1%May ’25: priced 3.9%Aug ’25: priced 4.0%Nov ’25: priced 4.0%Feb ’26: priced 4.3%May ’26: priced 4.2%Aug ’26: priced 5.4%4.0%4.5%eight beforelast four

From 4.0% over the eight before. The report’s own part of the move, with the ordinary drift taken out.

Columns Priced in the table below

Reportsthe last twelve, settledWrittenfrom the numbers on this pageHow each one is measured 

POST · earnings history: expected move vs actual move, all 14

CSV ↓
Columns shown on a phone
Every POST earnings report: expected move, actual move and IV crush
Report Report’s partPricedRank RealizedC2C By 10:00 Priced · realized · ±15% CrushATM As-sold Open ForecastPred. Error
Aug 6 ’26AMC ±5.4% rich≈100 −12.8% −9.7% −47% — — — —
May 7 ’26AMC ±4.2% ≈75 −0.9% −5.7% −39% −41% — — —
Feb 5 ’26AMC ±4.3% ≈82 +9.8% +10.5% −33% 6% — — —
Nov 20 ’25AMC ±4.0% 50 −7.2% −3.8% −10% −33% — −17% +7pt
Aug 7 ’25AMC ±4.0% 56 +4.9% +2.6% −37% −39% — −46% +10pt
May 8 ’25AMC ±3.9% ≈50 −0.1% −1.2% −42% −42% — — —
Feb 6 ’25AMC ±4.1% — +6.3% +4.4% −32% −16% −21% — —
Nov 14 ’24AMC ±4.5% — −1.5% −2.7% −17% −23% — −26% +10pt
Aug 1 ’24AMC ±4.7% — +3.0% +2.3% −36% −35% −35% −42% +7pt
May 2 ’24AMC ±3.4% — −2.1% +0.2% −42% −42% — −30% −12pt
Feb 1 ’24AMC ±3.6% — +7.7% +4.7% −33% −10% −25% −33% +1pt
Nov 16 ’23AMC ±3.8% — −1.4% −1.2% −27% −27% −19% −22% −5pt
Aug 3 ’23AMC ±4.1% — +2.7% +4.0% −34% −36% — — —
May 4 ’23AMC ±3.8% — +0.7% +2.8% −34% −34% −15% −29% −5pt
All · 14 ±4.1% avg 6 ranked 4.4% avg abs 4.0% avg abs −34% median −34% median −21% median −30% median 7.1pt avg abs
What the columns mean6 groups · 10 columns
Report’s part
The report’s share of what options priced at 15:46 ET the day before, taken from two or more expiries.
ColumnsPriced
Rank
Where the report’s part sits among POST’s own earlier reports, up to twelve, from 0 to 100: 100 on Aug 6 ’26 means it was priced higher than 12 of the 12 before it. Rich and cheap mark the top and bottom of that range. It needs eight earlier reports with a 10:00 move, so the oldest rows have none. ≈ marks a rank whose report’s part was uncertain: read it as roughly there, not exactly.
ColumnsRank
Realized
C2C is the move to the next close; By 10:00, the move to 10:00 the next morning.
ColumnsC2CBy 10:00
Chart
The grey band is what the options priced, the dark mark where the stock closed, the bar where it stood at 10:00, on a ±15% scale.
ColumnsPriced · realized · ±15%
Crush
How far implied volatility fell in the report’s expiry, from 15:46 ET the day before to the day after: at the new strike ATM and at the old one As-sold. Open reads it from the option’s 10:00 quotes the next morning, and is blank where there was none.
ColumnsATMAs-soldOpen
Forecast
Pred. is the crush we published the day before. POST is not in the public record, which covers only companies liquid enough for the split to be trusted. Error is what happened minus the forecast, in points of the crush.
ColumnsPred.Error
The stock closed past the priced move on 6 of 14 and was past it at 10:00 the next morning on 5 of 14. All 8 forecasts were rebuilt from history rather than published the day before, and all are graded here. POST is not in the public record, which covers only companies liquid enough for the split to be trusted. A dash is a number we do not have, not a zero. ≈ in Rank marks a report whose part was uncertain: ranked here against the company’s own past, but the board does not sort on it.
Reports14Open crush5 of 14Measured15:46 ET · day before → day afterEvery company’s full history is public 

how these numbers are measured

A day's price path that ends near where it started: a short graphite bracket for the move from close to close, beside a much taller oxblood one for how far it swung in betweento the closein between
Two ways to measure the move

Closing prices miss the open

If you hold through the report you meet the open, not the close. We publish both: the move from one close to the next, and where the stock stood at 10:00 the next morning.

POST May 2026: −0.9% by the close, −5.7% at 10:00.

§1 Timing and samples

One beam enters a prism and two leave, one oxblood and one slatethe reportordinary
The report’s own share of it

Option prices cover more than the report

An expiry a week out also carries a week of ordinary movement. Comparing two expiries that both contain the report separates the two, and the report's share is the priced move.

POST Aug 2026: 7.7% from the options → 5.4% for the report, 49% of that expiry's risk.

§3 Splitting the move

Five expiries on a line; an oxblood beam strikes only the first, while a faint bracket spans all fivethe one that movedwhat 30 days average
The collapse in volatility

We measure the expiry that moved

A 30-day average mixes the expiry holding the report with expiries it never reaches, so it reads shallower than what you held. We read the expiry that holds the report, the day before and the day after, at both strikes.

POST Aug 2026: −47% new strike.

§4 The collapse, three ways

POST · IV crush at the report’s expiry vs the 30-day average

One expiry contains the report. The 30-day figure is an average that also covers expiries the report never reaches. Every column below leans the same way, so the gap shows on each report, not only in the median.

Collapse at the report’s expiry−34%median, whole column
Seen by the 30-day number−21%median, the part it sees
Missed by the 30-day number13pton 11 of 14 reports
Aug 6 ’26May 7 ’26Feb 5 ’26Nov 20 ’25Aug 7 ’25May 8 ’25Feb 6 ’25Nov 14 ’24Aug 1 ’24May 2 ’24Feb 1 ’24Nov 16 ’23Aug 3 ’23May 4 ’23

POST · the expected move, where it closed, where it stood at 10:00

Each row is one report: the band is what the options priced, the mark is where the stock closed, and the bar runs to where it stood at 10:00 the next morning. On 1 of 14 reports with both, the close and 10:00 pointed opposite ways.

Where the 10:00 number is missing, the cell stays blank instead of borrowing the close, and the data-quality grid below says why. How far apart the two run differs from company to company; this window measures it for POST.

Median move to the next close2.9%past the price on 6 of 14
Median move by 10:00 the next morning3.3%past the price on 5 of 14
Aug 6 ’26−12.8−9.7
May 7 ’26−0.9−5.7
Feb 5 ’26+9.8+10.5
Nov 20 ’25−7.2−3.8
Aug 7 ’25+4.9+2.6
May 8 ’25−0.1−1.2
Feb 6 ’25+6.3+4.4
Nov 14 ’24−1.5−2.7
Aug 1 ’24+3.0+2.3
May 2 ’24−2.1+0.2
Feb 1 ’24+7.7+4.7
Nov 16 ’23−1.4−1.2
Aug 3 ’23+2.7+4.0
May 4 ’23+0.7+2.8
−15−7.50+7.5+15

POST · the term structure the day before each report

The split reads the report out of the gap between the two lines. The small figure under each date is how many trading sessions the expiry holding the report had left. A shorter one carries the same report over fewer days, so it reads higher without the report being priced any bigger.

Drawn for the last twelve reports, like the other figures on this page. It is history; the current curve is on the board.

the expiry holding the reportthe next expirythe gap the split readsimplied vol, %

POST · data quality, report by report

Counted over the 14 reports shown. One marker is on every report (macro event in the window), so it describes POST rather than any one quarter. The other twelve are on between one and nine reports.

Every marker on the reports above is counted here, one cell per report, newest first as in the history table.

Aug 6
’26
May 7
’26
Feb 5
’26
Nov 20
’25
Aug 7
’25
May 8
’25
Feb 6
’25
Nov 14
’24
Aug 1
’24
May 2
’24
Feb 1
’24
Nov 16
’23
Aug 3
’23
May 4
’23
reports
WithheldThe cell is blank on the marked reports.
no trade at the cover9 of 14
no prediction6 of 14
Shown, kept off the board’s sortPublished, but it does not rank this name on the board.
wide decomposition band6 of 14
derived numbers unreliable3 of 14
wide straddle quote2 of 14
Shown as measuredNotes on how a number was measured. Each says what it touches.
macro event in the window14 of 14
skew contamination9 of 14
no re-struck cover IV9 of 14
next-morning price from quotes5 of 14
held to expiry3 of 14
crush expiry substituted3 of 14
noisy IV rank3 of 14
30-day IV extrapolated1 of 14
What each marker means13 markers · 2 withhold a number

Withheld

no trade at the cover9 of 14open_crush_no_trade
The option legs did not trade at the 10:00 cover anchor, so the crush there could not be measured. It comes from the tape, not an outage, so it is permanent and counts in the published coverage ratio.
Lands inOpen
no prediction6 of 14crush_pred_unavailable
No predicted crush could be frozen for this print, so it has no entry in the scored accuracy record. Never filled in afterwards — a prediction written after the outcome is not one.
Lands inPred.Error

Shown, kept off the board’s sort

wide decomposition band6 of 14decomp_low_confidence
The decomposed implied move has a wide confidence band on this row. The number is published and kept off the board’s sort, because a sort cannot express an error bar; where its rank is shown, it is marked ≈.
Lands inPriced move
derived numbers unreliable3 of 14derived_unreliable
Quotes on this name were too wide — or a 25Δ wing was missing — for the derived numbers on this row to be trusted: implied move, decomposition, crush and skew. Shown, kept off the board’s sort, and marked ≈ where its rank is shown.
Lands inThe derived columns
wide straddle quote2 of 14wide_quote
The T−1 straddle’s bid-ask spread was wide relative to its own price, so every number read off that quote inherits the width. Published on purpose — the friction is real — but kept off the board’s sort, and marked ≈ where its rank is shown.
Lands inImplied (naive)Short-straddle P&Lon the ticker page, not this one

Shown as measured

macro event in the windowevery reportdecomp_macro_window
A scheduled macro event (a CPI print, an FOMC day) falls inside the decomposition window, so a little of the volatility attributed to the event belongs to the calendar instead.
Lands inPriced move
skew contamination9 of 14crush_skew_contaminated
The gap between the strike sold and where the stock ended up is large enough that the as-sold crush cannot stand in for the comparable one, so this print carries no scored open crush.
Lands inAccuracy recordon the public record, which does not include this company
no re-struck cover IV9 of 14open_crush_restruck_unavailable
The comparable at-the-money volatility could not be read at the 10:00 anchor, so only the as-sold contract is available there.
Lands inOpen
next-morning price from quotes5 of 14open_crush_restruck_quoted
The option at the 10:00 strike did not trade on both sides between 09:55 and 10:05, so the next-morning volatility was read from the midpoint of its quoted bid and ask over the same ten minutes. Used only when both sides were quoted and the quote was less than 50% wide.
Lands inOpen
held to expiry3 of 14cover_mark_settled
The straddle that was sold expired at one of these closes, so its price there is its settlement value: the distance from the stock to the strike. That exit pays no bid/ask spread, and it ignores the cost of being assigned stock on the in-the-money leg.
Lands inShort-straddle P&Lon the ticker page, not this one
crush expiry substituted3 of 14crush_expiry_substituted
The expiry that would have been measured was not available on both sides of the print, so a neighbouring one stood in. The crush is real; it is measured on a slightly different contract than the label implies.
Lands inATM
noisy IV rank3 of 14iv_rank_noisy
This name’s quote width is large against its own 52-week volatility range, so the rank carries a read error worth noting. A true property of a quiet name, not a defect — the rank itself is computed normally.
Lands inIV rankon the ticker page, not this one
30-day IV extrapolated1 of 14iv30_extrapolated
No pair of listed expiries brackets 30 days, so the 30-day volatility was extrapolated more than a week past the nearest one rather than interpolated. A shorter reach is not flagged: it moves the number by well under one volatility point.
Lands in30-day figureIV rankon the ticker page

POST · companies whose reports traded alike

Each company’s last twelve reports.average priced movemoved less than pricedmoved moremedian fall in implied volatilityPOST’s values

Six companies whose reports traded like POST’s

The closest on all three numbers at the top of each company page. It compares how the reports traded, not the businesses.

4%4%5%5%ADIAFLALVAMGNAPAAPDARARMKAXPBABALLBSXBUDBXCCAHCARRCATCCICFCICLXCMCSACPACPBCTASDDDEDHIDHRDLRDOWDRIEMRETNFASTFOXAGDGEGILDGWWHALHONIBKRIRMKGCKRKVUELMTMARMCKMDTMKCMPCMSFTMSIMTNOCNUEOMCOXYOZKPAASPHPHMPPGRACEREGNRTXSCHWSLBSNASTZSYKTAPTMUSTOLTRVTSCOTSMULVRTXWFCWMWMTPOSTPMBMYABTVZUSFDTMOaverage priced move →average move made →all 728
Where they sit. A close-up of POST’s part of the field; the small map in its corner shows where that sits among all 728 companies with a page and all three numbers. Grey dots are other companies here. Below the dashed line, a stock moved less than its options priced.
Figureseach company’s last twelve reportsCompared onpriced, moved, crush

the board · the last fortnight, then the next 14 days

PricedRichness · own historyRatioOutcome
  1. Reported · the fortnight to 5 Nov · settled, free
  2. 1COPConocoPhillipsNov 5BMO3.4%1001.79inside
  3. 2EOGEOG ResourcesNov 5AMC4.2%1001.58inside
  4. 3GEOGeo GroupNov 5BMO9.8%1001.31inside
  5. 4GHGuardant HealthNov 5AMC19.1%1002.10inside
  6. 5KTOSKratos Defense & Security SolutionsNov 5AMC11.9%1001.59inside
  7. Next 14 days · 523 names · symbol and date free
  8. ·AAONMon 9AMC—
  9. ·ABCLMon 9AMC—
  10. ·ACHRMon 9AMC—
  11. ·AIOTMon 9BMO—
  12. 11 of 523 shown · the next 14 days

    The ranked columns are the board

    Symbol and date are free for all 523 names. A subscription fills in the three columns held back on every locked row: the priced move, its richness against that name's own last twelve reports, and the ratio between them.

    $29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year
    $29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year

    A free account adds today’s board rows and the full 14-day calendar, without these three columns.

    Today's board rows and the full forward calendar are on your board.

  13. ·ALTGMon 9AMC—
  14. ·AMCXMon 9AMC—
  15. ·AMGMon 9BMO—
  16. ·AMPYMon 9AMC—
  17. ·AMRCMon 9AMC—
  18. ·ANNXMon 9BMO—
  19. ·APEIMon 9AMC—
The board: the last fortnight’s settled reports, then the next 14 days
#NameReportPriced moveRichness · own historyRatioOutcome
Reported · the fortnight to 5 Nov · settled, free
1COPConocoPhillipsNov 5BMO3.4%1001.79inside
2EOGEOG ResourcesNov 5AMC4.2%1001.58inside
3GEOGeo GroupNov 5BMO9.8%1001.31inside
4GHGuardant HealthNov 5AMC19.1%1002.10inside
5KTOSKratos Defense & Security SolutionsNov 5AMC11.9%1001.59inside
Next 14 days · 523 names · symbol and date free
·AAONMon 9AMC—
·ABCLMon 9AMC—
·ACHRMon 9AMC—
·AIOTMon 9BMO—
12 of 523 shown · the next 14 days

The ranked columns are the board

Symbol and date are free for all 523 names. A subscription fills in the three columns held back on every locked row: the priced move, its richness against that name's own last twelve reports, and the ratio between them.

$29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year
$29/mo or $290/yr Get the board two months free on the year

A free account adds today’s board rows and the full 14-day calendar, without these three columns.

Today's board rows and the full forward calendar are on your board.

·ALTGMon 9AMC—
·AMCXMon 9AMC—
·AMGMon 9BMO—
·AMPYMon 9AMC—
·AMRCMon 9AMC—
·ANNXMon 9BMO—
·APEIMon 9AMC—
·APPSMon 9AMC—
on the board — not known yet Ranked by richness against each name's own last twelve reports. Ratio is the priced move over that name’s typical actual move; inside: the stock stayed within the priced move.

How to read this page

History table
Its columns are explained right under it: What the columns mean ↑
Coverage
POST’s 14 reports. The board rows are the fortnight’s five richest settled reports, then the first of the next 523 names.
Ratio
The priced move over the name’s typical actual move.
Markers
Notes on a report’s data, counted in the data-quality grid with what each one touches.

A number looks wrong? Tell us what you expected and we’ll check it.Report a data issue

History is a record, not a forecast. Derived values only; no option prices are shown. Nothing here is investment advice.